Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_PageDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1244

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_CategoryDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1442

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class wpdb in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 306

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/cache.php on line 103

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/cache.php on line 431

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/query.php on line 61

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/theme.php on line 1109

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 0

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 0

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 0

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 0

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Dependencies in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 31

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/http.php on line 61
Blogtalk Downunder » Mathieu O’Neil - Weblogs and Authority

Blogtalk Downunder
   May 19-22, Sydney

Blogtalk Downunder

Mathieu O’Neil - Weblogs and Authority

Mathieu O’Neil

mathieu.oneil[at]anu.edu.au

Weblogs and Authority

[Read the complete paper (.rtf)]

Abstract

The promise of the mass use of the internet was that it would create a participatory political culture, where ‘netizens’ practised many kinds of liberating grassroots activities. Indeed, the Internet is often described as a horizontal and open structure which resists any kind of hierarchical organisation: a network, goes the argument, is by definition devoid of a centre, and hence of a central authority. This vision of the Internet and of blogspace as anarchic or heterarchic systems fails to account for a basic fact: if social networks have migrated online, it is logical to assume that the processes of differentiation, hierarchisation and control which, by all accounts, structure offline human interactions, have also done so.

In this paper, I analyse authoritative statements and actions in blogspace. According to the social network analytical model, power and authority on networks derive from centrality or ‘prominence’, the density of ties to other more or less centrally located individuals. Sites such as Technorati make success statistically measurable, by identifying the most authoritative blogs (those that are most linked to). Social network researchers assert that the apparently highly unequal distribution of links on the web and in blogspace constitutes a ‘power law’ distribution model: deterministic network forces are said to favour early entrants on the blog market; linking patterns are portrayed as inherently conservative, constraining new entrants and leading to the reinforcement of authoritative actors. The ‘power law’ takes on the immutable qualities of natural phenomena which cannot be questioned.

These analyses, which focus on network morphology and mechanisms, suffer from an inadequate conceptualization of human agency and culture, as well as from a tendency to consider online networks as isolated from offline social structures. What processes of differentiation and exclusion structure the social dynamics of blogspace? The antagonism between issue-based blogs and personal journals (epitomized by LiveJournal) reveals oppositions as to how authority is produced and reproduced, as well as diverging conceptions of virtual space. The relatively open space of issue-blogs is based on ‘quality’, where authoritative statements form the basis of the bartering of prestigious links, and of mainstream media recognition. The relatively closed space of LiveJournal is based on ‘intimacy’, where authoritative actions (such as the inclusions and inclusions of other users into journals) constitute the subtext of many conversations. Could the scorn poured on LiveJournal by issue-bloggers be attributed to gender (LiveJournal is predominantly peopled by females whilst the influential political blog subgroup – for example – is predominantly male)? Another explanation would relate to the relationship of actors to authority. Blogging signifies the extension of networking and linking, but also that of controlling and excluding; however the second part of the equation is not usually acknowledged in issue-based blogspace. LiveJournal reveals what lies behind blogging’s ‘participatory’ and ‘democratic’ rhetoric, and must, accordingly, be ostracized.

No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

generated in 0.110 seconds. | Powered by WordPress

part of an ever expanding network including edublogs - free education blogs, blogsavvy - professional blog consultant, wikisavvy - professional wiki consultant, incsub - social software and open source for education, in australia: melbourne blogs, sydney blogs & brisbane blogs, in the uk: london blogs, in the usa: new york blogs and incorporated subversion - social software, online education and james farmer