Always fresh new new things!

Archive for the ‘Knowledge Management’ Category

Social Bookmarking in Plain English

with 5 comments

Latest installment from Commoncraft’s Plain English Series: Social Bookmarking in Plain English using as example

Written by anol

August 8th, 2007 at 4:03 am

Periodic Table of Elements of Colaboration

without comments

Lars Trieloff from Mindquarry published a “periodic table” of the tools, technologies and approaches to support collaboration. Cute!

The aim of “Elements of Collaboration” is to give an overview about current collaboration techniques and technology and to show how better collaboration can lead to improved workflows and higher productivity.

Via: Patrick Lambe

Powered by ScribeFire.

Written by anol

August 7th, 2007 at 4:59 pm

Seven Reasons for Your Company to Start an Internal Blog

without comments

Via Jack Vinson, from CIO Magazine, by C.G. Lynch : Seven Reasons for Your Company to Start an Internal Blog from the just-completed Enterprise 2.0 conference. The article points out seven signs that your ‘email’ based communication might not be the most effective tool and you might be ready for an internal blog to serve as communication channel and ‘information repository’.

  1. Your enterprise e-mail applications are not easy to search.
  2. Your e-mail is lost in the eye of the “cc storm.”
  3. Ex-employees can take it with them.
  4. Too much wasted time checking in with colleagues.
  5. With blogs, the humble and the egotist both win.
  6. Organizational openness and accountability.
  7. People might already be using them.

Written by anol

June 23rd, 2007 at 4:21 pm

Connotea : enter the era of vertical folksonomy!

without comments

Connotea is like (online reference management, or social bookmarking + tagging) , but specifically catering to the needs of researchers, clinicians and scientists in bio-field! Enter the era of Vericalized Social Bookmarking!

The application is user-friendly, and the step by step guides (along with no-jargon word usage) should make the adaptation very easy for the non-techno-savvy-users. There are some nice video tutorials provided too.

The future of social bookmarking? Will this solve the low signal vs noise ratio in other generic social bookmark sites?

Thanks Daisy for the link.

Written by anol

June 4th, 2007 at 4:03 pm

Communities vs Networks

without comments

Few days back, Dave Snowden mentioned : All communities are networks, but not all networks are communities.

I couldn’t agree more. Being a member of Orkut, LinkedIn, Facebook (not much active) and few other forums (present and past) definitely increased the number of people I ‘know’ or my network radius; but certainly those are NOT any communities. There are (almost) no contextual discussions, no focussed goals to achieve. And I never look up to the members of those communities or me ‘peers’ for any clarifications or opinion.

I am not saying that those networks can’t be used for contextual conversation. LinkedIn Answers is certainly one of the exceptions, and we need to wait and see how (and if) the new Facebook Platform makes a difference. But certainly the inherited environment of those networks don’t promote the concept of a community. On the other hand – the Internet Time Community at Ning is definitely a community. There people are coming with one particular agenda and focus in mind, the context (Organizational Learning) is the king there.
Also, recently Patrick Lambe pointed out in a blogpost :

…how fragmentary and provisional such visualisations are. It all started with Josh Porter who has been blogging (here and here) on how we form networks that look like concentric circles, where trust dissipates outwards, using Ben Shneiderman’s “Circles of Relationships” visualisation. He got a lot of push back from folks who felt that this visualisation was too static and wasn’t adequate to the true complexity of human relationships.

Then Sarah Cooper published a small flash module that summed up the issue… well, in a flash. Go visit the live module and play with it – but essentially it demonstrates that the same people in your network can command different levels of closeness and trust depending on the topic. Click on a different topic, and the relative trust positions of the players all change.

There can’t be an all-in-one community, but there can be an all-in-one network! The Internet Time Community can become an community because there is a shared and focussed agenda, not because all members there are same ‘type’ of people.

What do you think? How we can use this ‘knowledge’ in organizations?

Written by anol

June 4th, 2007 at 5:45 am