Always fresh new new things!

Archive for February, 2005

Blog Comics

without comments

Blog Comics from Weblogg-ed News

Written by anol

February 24th, 2005 at 5:57 am

Posted in Social Media

History of Interactive Media

without comments

A Biased History of Interactive Media : from smackerel, Via: Boing Boing

A biased history of interactive media. We’ve recently finished the first 2 chapters of this history, covering the late 1980’s to about 1993. Filled with ancient screen samples and downloadable goodies, including the original virtual bubblewrap circa 1993.

First off, let’s face some facts: the web solutions industry is a lot less important than we once thought it was, and that’s putting it delicately. Our first clue should have been when interactive design became web orthodoxy. Orthodoxy quickly became brittle, silly, and expensive, and the whole industry collapsed in spectacular fashion a few years later. Most people, even friends and relatives, think we all got what was coming. Naturally, this is an excellent time for optimism.

Written by anol

February 24th, 2005 at 5:53 am

Killer Instinct!

without comments

Raffaele Iannello Knife Block – found at Gizmodo

You can’t buy this Knife Block, designed by Raffaele Iannello, from Vice Versa—they aren’t the buying sort of catalog—but you can lust after it all the same. The best meat is murder, after all.

Written by anol

February 24th, 2005 at 5:41 am

Posted in Wanton Posts

Information overload and PKM

without comments

From Mathemagenic : Information overload: questions and PKM: purposes and practices
In the Information overload post Lilia’s hypothesis –

it’s not about information overload, but our practices of dealing with information.

And she asks –

  • How do you manage multitasking? Strategies, tips and tricks to handle multiple processes…
  • How do you manage working with multiple sources needed for a task? Especially when there are a lot of them and they are in different formats (emails, files, paper documents, IM talks, coffee-table discussions).
  • How do you manage awareness? How do you monitor multiple sources of information that could be useful in the future? (I use weblogs :)
  • From the PKM post –

    Purpose is about what and why – e.g. capturing ideas, so they do not fly away and are available later. Practice is about how – e.g. writing ideas down as weblog posts or creating concept maps.
    Practice needs further elaboration – I have some categories in mind, but they do not fit together well.
    I’m thinking of methods and tools (methods more about strategy and tools are needed to execute it). For example, for documenting ideas a strategy would be to catch bits of ideas separately and to establish their relations to each other. This could be done by many tools, e.g. by writing in a weblog and linking posts with categories or links, by creating a concept map, by writing ideas on pieces of paper and then sorting them in groups… Tools that we have at our disposal and are capable of using influence our choices of strategies, but strategies invoke search for better tools…
    Process is about steps – what to do when (e.g. get an idea, tink of blogging it, find time to blog, start writing, think of relations, find other relevant posts and add links, finish, click submit button).
    Artefacts are “things” used or produces in a process: weblog posts, concept maps, paper cards with ideas…
    Awareness is a strange thing… I can’t define it properly, don’t know where it belongs, but know that it belongs to the picture.
    There are a few issues around purposes and practices:

    1. PKM purposes are often implicit, so choices of corresponding practices (=implicit and may be not optimal)
    2. Practices are often invisible (=not accounted for)
    3. Practices are interrelated: we use similar strategies or same tools for different purposes, we multitask on processes and have to fit them into definite time and artefacts could play different roles (e.g. as input, output or tool) (=all these things collide in time and space, leading to interruptions, dublication, conflicts and other non-productive things).

    Written by anol

    February 24th, 2005 at 5:36 am

    Prioritize Usability Testing and Web Analytics

    without comments

    Prioritize Usability Testing and Web Analytics by Bryan Eisenberg at ClickZ networks

    If you’ve performed usability tests and tried to reconcile those results with your current site metrics, you’ve probably been left scratching your head. Usability respondents find something wrong on a particular page, yet the same “problem” isn’t evident in the site analytics.

    This leaves you with a rather big question: How do you justify Web analytics and usability, and what role does each play in the conversion equation?

    Visitors don’t make decisions in a vacuum. They participate in multiple conversion scenarios, whether you plan them or not. They move through your site in the context of those scenarios, and their decisions are affected.

    Usability tests can show where technology or interfaces can stand improvement, but only Web analytics can measure how well a site addresses a visitor’s needs.

    Using both Web analytics and usability testing correctly makes for an explosive, one-two optimization punch.

    Via: Column Two

    Written by anol

    February 24th, 2005 at 5:10 am

    Posted in Usability & Design