Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_PageDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1244

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_CategoryDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1442

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class wpdb in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 306

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/cache.php on line 103

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/cache.php on line 431

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/query.php on line 61

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/theme.php on line 1109

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 0

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 0

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 0

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 0

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Dependencies in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 31

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/http.php on line 61

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/classes.php:1199) in /home/incsborg/public_html/blogtalk/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Implications of culture http://incsub.org/blogtalk/?p=135 19 - 21 May 2005 - Emergent Conversations Wed, 20 Sep 2017 07:19:34 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 By: marc http://incsub.org/blogtalk/?p=135&cpage=1#comment-215 marc Fri, 20 May 2005 23:08:39 +0000 http://incsub.org/blogtalk/?p=135#comment-215 I tend to agree that culture is a big issue in attempting to change the way people operate -- but agree that it's not only regional cultures, and suspect that is less of an issue than individual expectations of 'how stuff works'. ...can you tell I'm the non-acedemic here!? ; ) I worked on a *broadly* similar project about 6-7 years ago (if memory serves), for NGO's, attempting to draw together approx. 40-50 odd, very small and dispersed workers in the health and human services areas. The project attempted to apply all of the buzzwords, doc-management/sharing, bottom-up self-organisation, aggregation, customisation, syndication (all the '-ations') etc., but ultimately didn't strike enough of a chord across the user base, to sustain the level of interaction needed... it didn't quite hit 'critical mass'. IMHO the technology was not a particularly limiting factor, I would put the eventual under use to insufficient 'training', or perhaps more appropriately 'cultural change', in getting users for whom the computer was not their primary tool, or interest, to appreciate the potential in moving their point-to-point collaboration to an open platform (within their sector.) As a UI/interaction (whatever) designer, the other major factor would have been the 'interface' -- the extent to which the UI facilitated, and *encouraged* this sort of work, and got out of people's way, was sadly also an issue. I tend to agree that culture is a big issue in attempting to change the way people operate — but agree that it’s not only regional cultures, and suspect that is less of an issue than individual expectations of ‘how stuff works’.

…can you tell I’m the non-acedemic here!? ; )

I worked on a *broadly* similar project about 6-7 years ago (if memory serves), for NGO’s, attempting to draw together approx. 40-50 odd, very small and dispersed workers in the health and human services areas.

The project attempted to apply all of the buzzwords, doc-management/sharing, bottom-up self-organisation, aggregation, customisation, syndication (all the ‘-ations’) etc., but ultimately didn’t strike enough of a chord across the user base, to sustain the level of interaction needed… it didn’t quite hit ‘critical mass’.

IMHO the technology was not a particularly limiting factor, I would put the eventual under use to insufficient ‘training’, or perhaps more appropriately ‘cultural change’, in getting users for whom the computer was not their primary tool, or interest, to appreciate the potential in moving their point-to-point collaboration to an open platform (within their sector.)

As a UI/interaction (whatever) designer, the other major factor would have been the ‘interface’ — the extent to which the UI facilitated, and *encouraged* this sort of work, and got out of people’s way, was sadly also an issue.

]]>
By: Ash http://incsub.org/blogtalk/?p=135&cpage=1#comment-214 Ash Fri, 20 May 2005 22:27:36 +0000 http://incsub.org/blogtalk/?p=135#comment-214 Jan, I apologise. I actually knew it was Austria, but was writing that post whilst pausing to listen for salient points from another presenter. It sounds like a fascinating project. Inter-organisational, intra-organisational, and professional cultures would of course also bring great bearing to this. I was merely suggesting that it would be interesting to test the same system with a macro culture pre-disposed to being more public than one which tends toward greater privacy. Good luck with future iterations! Jan,

I apologise. I actually knew it was Austria, but was writing that post whilst pausing to listen for salient points from another presenter.

It sounds like a fascinating project. Inter-organisational, intra-organisational, and professional cultures would of course also bring great bearing to this. I was merely suggesting that it would be interesting to test the same system with a macro culture pre-disposed to being more public than one which tends toward greater privacy.

Good luck with future iterations!

]]>
By: JanSchmidt http://incsub.org/blogtalk/?p=135&cpage=1#comment-210 JanSchmidt Fri, 20 May 2005 08:38:02 +0000 http://incsub.org/blogtalk/?p=135#comment-210 Actually, the project was launched in Austria, but Austrian culture is probably more similar to the German than to the Mediterranean.. :) Being one of Thomas' project partners on developing/researching the platform, I agree that taking cultural variables into account is very important to explain sucessfull/failed adoption of social software. However, rather than taking the macroscopic perspective and comparing national cultures, I'd lean to a more "meso-" or "micro-approach", that is looking at the shared values and practices in the participating organizations (some of them are in the middle of a restructuring process), the project teams or even the individual knowledge workers. Thomas has probably mentioned it; we did quite a number of in-depth interviews prior to launching the platform to learn about existing attitudes to knowledge sharing and the corresponding practices. It will definitely be necessary to get back to the people later this year and talk about their experiences - I guess we will be able to delineate the importance of technological, social, and cultural factors, respectively. Actually, the project was launched in Austria, but Austrian culture is probably more similar to the German than to the Mediterranean.. :)
Being one of Thomas’ project partners on developing/researching the platform, I agree that taking cultural variables into account is very important to explain sucessfull/failed adoption of social software. However, rather than taking the macroscopic perspective and comparing national cultures, I’d lean to a more “meso-” or “micro-approach”, that is looking at the shared values and practices in the participating organizations (some of them are in the middle of a restructuring process), the project teams or even the individual knowledge workers. Thomas has probably mentioned it; we did quite a number of in-depth interviews prior to launching the platform to learn about existing attitudes to knowledge sharing and the corresponding practices. It will definitely be necessary to get back to the people later this year and talk about their experiences - I guess we will be able to delineate the importance of technological, social, and cultural factors, respectively.

]]>