<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Return!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://incsub.org/blog/2006/the-return/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://incsub.org/blog/2006/the-return</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:15:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg Ritter</title>
		<link>http://incsub.org/blog/2006/the-return/comment-page-1#comment-9384</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incsub.org/blog/2006/the-return#comment-9384</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the nod, James (and thanks to Scott; I&#039;d thank you on your site, Scott, but comments seem to be down). I&#039;m not sure what &quot;tetchy&quot; means -- must be an Aussie term-- but I&#039;ll take it as a compliment. 

But I think the *real* story here is that this is a Blackboard blog, not just a Greg Ritter blog. I&#039;m glad to be a part of it (and I&#039;ve been lobbying for it behind the scenes for a long while), but it really is a team effort. 

...

Hey! I just looked up &quot;tetchy&quot;! Am not!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the nod, James (and thanks to Scott; I&#8217;d thank you on your site, Scott, but comments seem to be down). I&#8217;m not sure what &#8220;tetchy&#8221; means &#8212; must be an Aussie term&#8211; but I&#8217;ll take it as a compliment. </p>
<p>But I think the *real* story here is that this is a Blackboard blog, not just a Greg Ritter blog. I&#8217;m glad to be a part of it (and I&#8217;ve been lobbying for it behind the scenes for a long while), but it really is a team effort. </p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Hey! I just looked up &#8220;tetchy&#8221;! Am not!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://incsub.org/blog/2006/the-return/comment-page-1#comment-9359</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 05:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incsub.org/blog/2006/the-return#comment-9359</guid>
		<description>Awww... he does have a bit of a point though!

I know what you mean about energy though... need extra reserves. No stress about unfairness, no offense taken... one of the things I like best about Greg is that he&#039;s good and tetchy, the more bridling the better I reckon :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awww&#8230; he does have a bit of a point though!</p>
<p>I know what you mean about energy though&#8230; need extra reserves. No stress about unfairness, no offense taken&#8230; one of the things I like best about Greg is that he&#8217;s good and tetchy, the more bridling the better I reckon :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Leslie</title>
		<link>http://incsub.org/blog/2006/the-return/comment-page-1#comment-9325</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 23:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incsub.org/blog/2006/the-return#comment-9325</guid>
		<description>Actually James, it was a bit unfair of me to point to your post as the source of the knee-jerkitis, it was Harold&#039;s comments that really got my goat. Sorry if it was a cheap shot - I should have just posted my own rebuttal in my blog if I felt strongly enough about it, but in the end just decided to let it slide as I didn&#039;t have the energy to get into it. Cheers, Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually James, it was a bit unfair of me to point to your post as the source of the knee-jerkitis, it was Harold&#8217;s comments that really got my goat. Sorry if it was a cheap shot &#8211; I should have just posted my own rebuttal in my blog if I felt strongly enough about it, but in the end just decided to let it slide as I didn&#8217;t have the energy to get into it. Cheers, Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Ritter Returns! at D&#8217;Arcy Norman Dot Net</title>
		<link>http://incsub.org/blog/2006/the-return/comment-page-1#comment-9318</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ritter Returns! at D&#8217;Arcy Norman Dot Net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incsub.org/blog/2006/the-return#comment-9318</guid>
		<description>[...] Thanks to Scott and James for the heads-up on Ritter&#8217;s Return.&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thanks to Scott and James for the heads-up on Ritter&#8217;s Return.&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
