<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging for cash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://incsub.org/blog/2004/blogging-for-cash/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://incsub.org/blog/2004/blogging-for-cash</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:15:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Farmer</title>
		<link>http://incsub.org/blog/2004/blogging-for-cash/comment-page-1#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>James Farmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 23:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incsub.org/blog/?p=98#comment-338</guid>
		<description>Now you&#039;ve got me too you see, I want to hang around and am thinking about it more because you&#039;re doing it.... bugger :D

You&#039;re right Harold, I wouldn&#039;t be averse to making money through this blog (or driving something that I believe in that might also make me money)... I guess it&#039;s just about how that might happen... for example, web-based advertising seems far less of an issue to me than RSS feed advertising which seems again far less of an issue as writing about something directly... but then again if you&#039;re totally upfront about it (I mean, like Robin Good&#039;s reviews etc. which I happily subscribe to but am sure he makes money from, cos they&#039;re so good!)....

aaaaaarrrrgggghhhh

Whatever, I guess, I&#039;m interested in this though now so am probably going to hang around and write about it myself... double bugger ;oD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now you&#8217;ve got me too you see, I want to hang around and am thinking about it more because you&#8217;re doing it&#8230;. bugger :D</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right Harold, I wouldn&#8217;t be averse to making money through this blog (or driving something that I believe in that might also make me money)&#8230; I guess it&#8217;s just about how that might happen&#8230; for example, web-based advertising seems far less of an issue to me than RSS feed advertising which seems again far less of an issue as writing about something directly&#8230; but then again if you&#8217;re totally upfront about it (I mean, like Robin Good&#8217;s reviews etc. which I happily subscribe to but am sure he makes money from, cos they&#8217;re so good!)&#8230;.</p>
<p>aaaaaarrrrgggghhhh</p>
<p>Whatever, I guess, I&#8217;m interested in this though now so am probably going to hang around and write about it myself&#8230; double bugger ;oD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard MacManus</title>
		<link>http://incsub.org/blog/2004/blogging-for-cash/comment-page-1#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard MacManus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 19:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incsub.org/blog/?p=98#comment-337</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments. What you say is pretty much my fear about doing this and I totally understand where you&#039;re coming from. I too am &quot;skeptically positive&quot; about this (love that phrase!). I&#039;m not sure how this is going to turn out, but time will tell... the jury is still out with me too on the moral/ethical issues.

Cheers, Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments. What you say is pretty much my fear about doing this and I totally understand where you&#8217;re coming from. I too am &#8220;skeptically positive&#8221; about this (love that phrase!). I&#8217;m not sure how this is going to turn out, but time will tell&#8230; the jury is still out with me too on the moral/ethical issues.</p>
<p>Cheers, Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold Jarche</title>
		<link>http://incsub.org/blog/2004/blogging-for-cash/comment-page-1#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold Jarche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 17:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incsub.org/blog/?p=98#comment-336</guid>
		<description>If he&#039;s up front about it, as he is, then what is the problem? It&#039;s not dishonesty, it&#039;s a form of capitalism to which you don&#039;t agree. It&#039;s also your right to delete him from your blogroll. Overall, it seems like an OK system - for now. I also understand that this could lead to some conflict of interest issues, as Stowe Boyd has suggested. 

For now, I&#039;ll remain skeptically positive, and cheer them on for making some cash. At this point in my free-agent career, cash is good. My bank does not recognize my blog as a capital asset ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If he&#8217;s up front about it, as he is, then what is the problem? It&#8217;s not dishonesty, it&#8217;s a form of capitalism to which you don&#8217;t agree. It&#8217;s also your right to delete him from your blogroll. Overall, it seems like an OK system &#8211; for now. I also understand that this could lead to some conflict of interest issues, as Stowe Boyd has suggested. </p>
<p>For now, I&#8217;ll remain skeptically positive, and cheer them on for making some cash. At this point in my free-agent career, cash is good. My bank does not recognize my blog as a capital asset ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

